ThePreppersBlueprint.com

Build a plan for water, food, power and security, then buy only gear that earns it

MCG Tactical The Stinger Optic Review: A Practical Look at This Budget Red Dot Sight vs Common Alternatives: What Changes

posted on

By ThePreppersBlueprint.com Editorial Team

Comparison Summary

Article: MCG Tactical The Stinger Optic Review: A Practical Look at This Budget Red Dot Sight vs Common Alternatives: What Changes

What this page covers: What The Stinger Optic Is, and Why a Comparison Matters Our original Stinger Optic review looked at the product on its own.

What The Stinger Optic Is, and Why a Comparison Matters

Our original Stinger Optic review looked at the product on its own. This piece puts it next to the realistic alternatives — iron sights, other entry-level red dots, and premium holographic sights — so you can see how the tradeoffs line up in matching terms before deciding what fits your setup and budget.

Stinger Specs, Verified Against Multiple Sources

These details are cross-checked across the manufacturer’s product pages and independent hands-on reviews:

  • Reticle: Dual red/green illuminated circle-dot, roughly a 65 MOA outer ring with a 1 MOA center dot — visually similar to EOTECH-style holographic reticles, though the Stinger uses reflex-sight technology rather than true holographic diffraction
  • Brightness settings: 8 manual settings across both colors
  • Magnification: True 1x with unlimited eye relief
  • Adjustment: Windage and elevation move in ½ MOA clicks
  • Housing: Aluminum; the manufacturer describes it as shockproof and fogproof
  • Weight: Approximately 6.9 ounces
  • Mounting: Cantilever mount, Picatinny/Weaver/MIL-STD compatible, designed to allow co-witness with backup iron sights
  • Power: Runs on a CR123A battery with a 2-hour auto-shutoff when idle; MCG Tactical does not publish an official runtime figure

A note on terminology: “MIL SPEC” covers a range of different individual military manufacturing standards. The manufacturer’s marketing doesn’t specify which particular standard, if any, the Stinger has been tested against — worth keeping in mind as a general durability claim rather than a specific certification.

Vs. Iron Sights

  • Speed: A reflex-style dot generally allows faster target acquisition than aligning front and rear iron sight posts, since you’re placing one dot rather than stacking two reference points.
  • Reliability: Iron sights have no battery and nothing electronic to fail. The Stinger depends on a CR123A cell — if it dies without a spare on hand, you lose the illuminated reticle.
  • Tradeoff: Faster target acquisition against zero battery dependency — which one matters more depends on how you’re using the rifle.

Vs. Other Entry-Level Red Dot Sights

  • Reticle type: Many budget red dots use a single dot rather than a circle-dot pattern. Circle-dot can help close-range speed; a plain dot can give a cleaner sight picture at distance. This comes down to shooter preference more than a clear advantage either way.
  • Illumination options: Dual red/green with 8 settings is more feature-rich than many single-color budget competitors offer.
  • Published track record: Established budget-tier brands (roughly $80–$150) generally have reviews from major outdoor or tactical publications and clearly listed warranty terms. At the time of writing, the material cited here doesn’t show equivalent third-party publication coverage or listed warranty terms for the Stinger, so ask the company for its warranty terms before you buy; this gap isn’t necessarily a mark against the product itself.

Vs. Premium Holographic Sights

  • Technology: True holographic sights project the reticle via laser diffraction through a glass window; some shooters find that reticle stays usable even with a partially obstructed or cracked lens. The Stinger is a reflex sight that visually resembles that style of reticle without using the same underlying technology.
  • Price: Premium holographic optics from established military-contract suppliers cost several times more than the Stinger, reflecting both the technology difference and a longer history of contract-level durability testing.
  • Positioning: The Stinger is marketed as a lower-cost alternative to this category rather than a technical equivalent to it.

Who Might Reasonably Consider It

  • Preppers testing whether a red-dot-style sight picture suits them before spending more on a higher-tier brand — see our prepper gear checklist for how to prioritize this kind of purchase
  • A dedicated training rifle used to teach new shooters, where an optic issue has low consequences
  • Casual range or hunting use rather than a primary defensive firearm

Who Should Weigh Other Options

  • Anyone equipping a primary home defense firearm and wanting a documented durability and warranty track record behind the optic
  • Shooters who train or compete regularly and want published, independent testing to reference
  • Buyers who prefer to confirm warranty terms in writing before purchase

Limitations of This Comparison

Real-world performance depends on more than the optic itself — firearm platform, mounting quality, ammunition, and shooter experience all factor in. Independent, standardized durability and battery-life testing on the Stinger specifically is limited; what’s available comes from informal reviewer accounts rather than lab data. Pricing and promotional terms on tactical gear sites change frequently, so confirm current pricing and any warranty terms directly with the vendor before buying. For general gear prioritization, see our survival gear section.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Stinger a true holographic sight?

No. Available information indicates it’s a reflex sight with a reticle pattern designed to resemble holographic optics visually. True holographic sights use laser diffraction technology, which works differently.

How does the price compare to established brands?

The Stinger’s current listed price is around $69. Comparable red dot sights from established brands like Bushnell, Vortex, or Sig Sauer generally retail between $100 and $300. The vendor’s listed “original price” of $796 is a marketing figure we could not independently verify against a prior sale history.

Does it hold zero after impacts, and what’s the battery life?

Independent durability and runtime data for both questions is limited. The manufacturer doesn’t publish a battery runtime figure, and standardized third-party drop or recoil testing wasn’t available at the time of writing.

What warranty does it come with?

Warranty terms aren’t clearly listed on the vendor site as of this writing. If that matters for your use case, it’s worth contacting the manufacturer directly for written terms before purchase.

Disclosure

This article contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you — see our affiliate disclosure for details. This is informational content, not a certification of military specification compliance or a guarantee of product performance. See our how we review page for our evidence standards.

Related guides